Management of Arterio-Venous Fistula Side Branches During Maturation: Ligation or Coil Embolization.

OBJECTIVE: Failure of maturation of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) remains an ongoing concern for dialysis access. One etiology is the presence of side branches that divert flow from the main AVF channel. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular and open surgical interventions for AVF side branches in the setting of maturation failure. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients within a 10-year period with primary radio cephalic and brachiocephalic AVF was undertaken, and 380 cases of maturation failure related to branch diversion were selected for the study. Fifty-four percent and 48% of the AVF in the ENDO and OPEN groups respectively have concomitant stenosis further along in the flow path that required intervention by balloon angioplasty at the same time as a side branch intervention. All patients underwent duplex imaging or a fistulogram before intervention. Indications were low flow (<600 mL/min) or failure to increase in size (<6 mm diameter) in all cases. Interventions were divided into endovascular (coil embolization; ENDO) and surgical (branch ligation; OPEN) interventions. Outcomes of maturation (successful progression to hemodialysis (HD)), re-intervention, and functional dialysis (continuous HD for three consecutive months) were examined. RESULTS: From January 2008 to December 2018, 187 patients (49^ of all cases with side branches; 65% female, age of 57 ± 18 years; mean ± SD) with poorly maturing radiocephalic (70%) and brachiocephalic AVF (30%) underwent intervention due to the presence of accessory venous branches only. Indications were failure to mature in 54% and low flow in 46%. The average time to intervention due to failure to mature was 5 ± 4 weeks (mean ± SD) after primary access placement. Eighty-one had coil embolization and 106 had open branch ligation. Technical success was 90% in ENDO and 100% in OPEN. Technical ENDO failures had a secondary open branch ligation but were considered failures for analysis. Repeat interventions by balloon-assisted maturation were required in 45% of all the cases with no difference between ENDO and OPEN. Recannulation of the ENDO branches occurred in 10% of the cases requiring repeat intervention. Sixty one percent of isolated endovascular (n = 49) and 64% of isolated open (n = 68) matured to successful cannulation (P = 0.84). Median functional dialysis durations remained equivalent between ENDO (2.6 years) and OPEN (2.8 years) groups (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: There is an improved maturation rate following the ENDO group compared to OPEN interventions while both ENDO and OPEN modalities demonstrated similar long-term functionality.

Extent of heel ulceration influences the outcomes in patients with isolated infrapopliteal limb threatening critical ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of the extent of heel ulceration on the outcomes of limb threatening critical ischemia due to isolated infrapopliteal disease. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 989 patients with isolated infrapopliteal disease and heel ulceration treated from 2001 to 2018. The heel was defined as the back of the foot, extending from the Achilles tendon to around the plantar surface and covering the apex of the calcaneum bone. Heel ulceration was categorized into three groups by area: <5 cm2, 5 to 10 cm2, and >10 cm2. The interventions were endovascular, open bypass, major amputation, and wound care. An intention-to-treat analysis by patient group was performed. The 30-day outcomes and amputation-free survival (AFS; survival without a major amputation) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 989 patients, 384 (58% male; average age, 65 years; n = 768 vessels) had undergone isolated endovascular tibial intervention, 124 (45% male; average age, 59 years) had undergone popliteal tibial vein bypass for limb threatening critical ischemia, 219 (52% male; average age, 67 years) had undergone major amputation, and 242 (49% male; average age, 66 years) had received wound care. No difference was found in the 30-day major adverse cardiac events in the endovascular and open bypass groups, with significantly more events in the major amputation group (P = .03). The 30-day major adverse limb events and 30-day amputation rates were equivalent between the open bypass and endovascular groups. The 5-year AFS rate was superior in the open bypass group (37% ± 8%; mean ± standard error of the mean) compared with the endovascular group (27% ± 9%; P = .04). The wound care group had a 5-year AFS rate of 20% ± 9%, which was not significantly different from that of the endovascular group. Patients with heel ulcers of <5 cm2 had better AFS (47% ± 8%) than those with 5- to 10- cm2 heel ulceration (24% ± 9%). Heel ulcers >10 cm2 were associated with markedly worse 5-year AFS outcomes (0% ± 0%). The presence of end-stage renal disease, osteomyelitis, uncontrolled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c >10%), and/or frailty combined with a heel ulcer >10 cm2 were predictive of poor AFS. CONCLUSIONS: An increasing heel ulcer area combined with osteomyelitis and systemic comorbidities was associated with worsening 30-day outcomes and 5-year AFS, irrespective of the therapy chosen.

Implications of early failure of isolated endovascular tibial interventions.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular tibial interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia are frequent, but the implications of early failure (≤30 days) of an isolated tibial intervention are still unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the patient-centered outcomes after early failure of isolated tibial artery intervention. METHODS: A database of patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular interventions between 2007 and 2017 was retrospectively queried. Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Rutherford classes 4, 5, and 6) were selected, and failures within 30 days were identified. Lack of technical success at the time of the procedure was an exclusion. Intention-to-treat analysis by patient was performed. Patient-oriented outcomes of clinical efficacy (absence of recurrent symptoms, maintenance of ambulation, and absence of major amputation), amputation-free survival (survival without major amputation), and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALEs; above-ankle amputation of the index limb or major reintervention [new bypass graft, jump or interposition graft revision]) were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 1779 patients (58% male; average age, 65 years; 2898 vessels) who underwent tibial intervention for chronic limb-threatening ischemia; 284 procedures (16%) were early failures. In the early failure group, 124 cases (44%) were considered immediate (<24 hours), and 160 cases (56%) failed within the first 30 days after intervention. The two modes of failure were hemodynamic failure (47%) and progression of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (53%). Bypass after early failure was successful in patients with adequate vein, target vessel of ≥3 mm, and good inframalleolar runoff. Progression of symptoms was associated with major amputation in patients with Rutherford class 5 and class 6 disease. Presentation with diabetes and end-stage renal disease were identified as independent clinical predictors for early failure. Lesion calcification, reference vessel diameter <3 mm, lesion length >300 mm, and poor inframalleolar runoff were identified as independent anatomic predictors for early failure and increased MALEs. Early failure was predictive of poor long-term clinical efficacy (11% ± 9% vs 39% ± 8% at 5 years, mean ± standard error of the mean, early vs no early failure; P = .01) and amputation-free survival (16% ± 9% vs 47% ± 9% at 5 years, mean ± standard error of the mean, early vs no early failure; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Both clinical and anatomic factors can predict early failure of endovascular therapy for isolated tibial disease. Early failure significantly increases 30-day major amputation and 30-day MALEs and is associated with poor long-term patient-centered outcomes.

Short-term contemporary outcomes for staged versus primary lower limb amputation in diabetic foot disease.

BACKGROUND: Major lower extremity amputations remain among the most common procedures performed by vascular surgeons in patients with diabetes and its associated peripheral vascular disease. After major amputation, this population commonly suffers from high readmission rates, increased wound complications, and conversion to more proximal major amputations. These events impact quality in terms of cost, resources, and subjective quality of life. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes between primary lower extremity above-ankle amputations (primary amputation [PA]) and staged ankle guillotine amputations followed by interval formalization to an above-ankle amputation (staged amputation [SA]) for nonsalvageable infected diabetic foot disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of all de novo major lower extremity amputations performed by the vascular surgery service at a single institution between January 2014 and March 2017 was performed. Inclusion criteria were diabetic patients with foot gangrene who underwent a major de novo above- or below-knee amputation. Amputations for trauma, acute limb ischemia, or malignancy were excluded. Per institutional practice, SA was performed for uncontrolled infection and/or infection with uncontrolled diabetes, and PA was performed in the absence of active infection and in stable diabetes. The primary outcome measure was 30-day freedom from conversion to a higher level amputation. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day stump complications, 30-day readmissions, 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-eight percent were male, 18% were active smokers, 30% had end-stage renal disease, and 22% had congestive heart failure. Sixty-one patients underwent SA, and 55 patients underwent PA. The two cohorts were well-matched by demographics and comorbidities. Consistent with the institutional practice, 57% of SA patients met two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria at presentation compared with 24% of PA patients (P = .0003). There were no 30-day mortalities. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events between the groups (2% vs 4%; SA vs PA, respectively; P = .6). The average length of stay did not significantly differ between SA and PA (mean of 14 ± 8 days vs 11 ± 11 days; P = .1). SA patients had a lower rate of 30-day readmission (7% vs 27%; P = .005) and 30-day unplanned conversion to higher level amputation (2% vs 13%; P = .026) compared with PA patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of infected diabetic foot disease, a staged lower extremity amputation achieves quality outcomes superior to a one-stage amputation, despite the former cohort's greater illness acuity level. SA should be considered in all diabetic patients presenting with active foot infection.